COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD versus NEW MALIK GOODS, HYDERABAD
Sections 170 (4), 115 (4), 114 (6) and 153 (1) (b) of the Department of Refund Services Review claimed that the taxpayers had made a statement under section 115 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001. Filed and edited since then. Returns under section 114 (6) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, with the same income, which was not valid under the law and the taxpayer rightly rejected the return claim as requested by the taxpayers. Is. It is well known that the order of the taxation officer's refusal to request an order's return was not sustained by the law because the nature of the service was established and sections 153 (1) (b) and (c) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 The deduction was tax. The First Appellate Authority's observation that no exception can be drawn that the taxation officer had failed to complete the order within time and that the taxpayer filed by the taxpayer was not allowed to hear the return of the taxpayer's Income Tax Ordinance 2001 The deduction of the terms and conditions of section 211, if any, shall be liable to be returned to the taxpayers of the department, by the Appellate Tribunal.
