Find a Lawyer

MADINA TRADERS, KAMOKE versus COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, LAHORE

Sections 45B, 2 (46) (B) (E), Sales Tax General Order No. 9 of 1999, Sales Tax General Order No. 11 of 1999, Dated 2 10 1999 Appeal to Moto Review Delay End Once Appellate Authority After the appeal on 15 12 2003, the appeal was not entertaining. By Moto Moto himself had reviewed the decision - delayed condolences because a copy of the order was not actually received in the department despite the fact that the demand notice was taken by 21 2003 2003. Against the same order, the appellate tribunal in the original order vacated by the deputy collector through the appellate tribunal, which was passed without legal basis and allowed the appeal of taxpayers. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Inland, 2011

• COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD v. MIAN GHOUS BUX (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 424
• COLLECTORATE OF SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, FAISALABAD v. ZAHEER SOAP FACTORY, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 429
• IHSAN YOUSUF TEXTILES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 454
• COSY INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX (RTO), FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 456
• INTERLOOP (PVT.) LIMITED, FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 467
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD v. NEW MALIK GOODS, HYDERABAD 2011 PTD 473
• NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 483
• MEDIA TIMES (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, LAHORE 2011 PTD 491

All Inland judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocates contact from Usta Mohammad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes