Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD versus SHAMSHAD TEXTILE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FAISALABAD

Section 10 Sales Tax Rules, 2006, R28 Section RO 1204 (I) / 2007 Dated 11 12 2007 Filing of Input Tax Withdrawal Claims A limitation appeal was filed by the department on this matter. That the taxpayer had failed to file a refund claim. With no reason to support the documents within the stipulated period, such claim was no longer valid. The appellate tribunal rejected the claim that there were no exemptions on the basis of the principles of limitation. can go.

Related judgments — Inland, 2011

• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD v. NEW MALIK GOODS, HYDERABAD 2011 PTD 473
• NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 483
• MEDIA TIMES (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, LAHORE 2011 PTD 491
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, MULTAN v. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ TEXTILE MILLS, BUREWALA 2011 PTD 505
• Mst. NASEEM AKHTAR, FAISALABAD v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 553
• COMMISSIONER, LEGAL DIVISION, RTO, HYDERABAD v. LATIF NIAZI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD 2011 PTD 565
• CIR, LD, RTO, HYDERABAD v. HASSAN MASOOD BAIG, HYDERABAD 2011 PTD 590
• EN EM ENTERPRISES v. ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE, (ADJUDICATION), LAHORE 2011 PTD 619

All Inland judgments of 2011 →

best law firms from Ziarat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes