NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FAISALABAD versus COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD
Section 10 (4) and 11 Section RO 555 (I) / 2006 Dated 5 6 2006 Section RO 575 (I) / 2002 Dated 31 8 2002 Section R 485 (I) / 2004 Dated 12 6 2004 Input Tax Returned Zero-rated Supply Textile Goods claim refunds during October, 2001, January, 2002, April, 2002 and April 2005, refunds based on unusual tax profile accuracy period / abnormal tax profile of Denial of Sales Tax was borne by the Automated Refund Repository Complaint claims for computer system sales tax act, 1990, or any law enforcement or refund claim on such object by the Federal Board of Revenue. KK Was not subject to any written guidance, the term, there is no legal support. The same was to be investigated under the Sales Tax Automated Refund Repository when returns from July 1, 2006 should have been made under the Sales Tax Refund Rules, 2002 and not under the Sales Tax Automatic Refund Repository System for the first time. Was introduced. Sales tax rolls In 2004, the rejection of refund claims filed against the invoices issued by the Sales Tax Automated Refund Repository Computer System prior to July 1, 2006 was illegal and invalid.
