CIR, LD, RTO, HYDERABAD versus HASSAN MASOOD BAIG, HYDERABAD
Section 32 ()) Association of Evaluation Editors Was Selected for Audit The Association of Individuals purchased property, which included a large investment, in which members of the association were invested in individuals. In the case of the association, the proceedings were excluded while for the audit after amending any review under section 122 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, under section 111 (1) (b) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 The case of members initiated by the selection of their cases. The first appellate authority had deleted section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 for violating the Code Pro Coverage Subsection (5), there was no provision to amend the assessment order. It only sets out the criteria under which the provisions of sections (1) and (4) of section 122 of section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and the provisions of sections (1) and (4) of section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 An officer from could edit a diagnosis. No legal authority to amend an assessment can be amended by an officer under sections (1) and (4) of sections 122 of section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance, The 2001 assertion that seeking to supply Section 122 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 to amend the Assessment Order through the action of the officer was illegal and unlawful and was not sustainable in the eyes of the law. The officer was assigned only to carry out the audit proceedings and there was no legal issue even after such an offer. The Evaluation Officer provided the moral justification for amending the assessment for the same tax year 2008.
