Find a Lawyer

KADRIAH-I LTD. versus

Section 3 and 4 of the Admiralty Case for Sale of Plaintiff with the Plaintiff's Ship Sale by the Plaintiff with the Plaintiff Ship by the Plaintiff's Non-Compliance with the Plaintiff The sale of the ship to the plaintiff is pending in overseas court due to such default against the shipowner by the plaintiff filing such lawsuit by the plaintiff due to such default by the defendant's owner Damages under which the plaintiff's rehabilitation proceedings are remanded under Section 3 (2) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Dennis, 1980 was valid only against the claim of an unlawful or defamatory plaintiff, and was not born of any circumstance nor of a nature provided under the Ordinance 1980 of the High Courts of Admiralty jurisdiction. , Or against the ship's owner. Or the plaintiff's claim for damages caused by such default by the plaintiff did not include the provisions of section 3 (2) of the ARD by the defendant. As such, the defense was rejected for lack of defense.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• Mst. BANO alias GUL BANO v. Begum DILSHAD ALAM 2011 CLC 88
• MUHAMMAD DIN v. Mst. SHAMIM AKHTAR 2011 MLD 89
• NOMAN ABID v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CLIFTON, KARACHI 2011 PLD 99
• MUHAMMAD ALI v. State 2011 PCrLJ 101
• QAMARUDDIN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH 2011 PLC(CS) 102
• SHABBAR MALIK v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary Ministry of Communication 2011 MLD 104
• SHER DIL KHOSO v. State 2011 YLR 105
• SHAHEEN AIRPORT SERVICES v. NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION through Deputy Registrar 2011 PLC 105

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocates email from Gojra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes