MST. BANO ALIAS GUL BANO versus BEGUM DILSHAD ALAM
O VII, R 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54, filed an application under OVII, R 11, CPC to reject applicants for declaration and injunction on the ground that the plaintiff. Did not disclose the reason. The prosecution and the plaintiff in this case from time to time filed a petition on the ground that it stated that the application was purely related to the defense of the defendants, which were disputed facts and from the scope of O VII, R 11, CPC. Was outside and furthermore there was an important question in this case. The facts and law of the case must be valid at the trial, which is the bone of contention between the parties stated in the case, and the written statement showed considerable controversy with the mixed question of law and facts which required proof and when Until the evidence is recorded, the dispute between the parties could not be resolved by the plaintiffs who had properly pleaded due to the proceedings in the plaintiff and if the cause of action described in the plaintiff is considered true and correct. t, the case was not barred in the matter of disputed facts of fact or the provision of the law of O VII, R 11, the CPC could not be summoned, but in such cases the court could discuss the appropriate questions. And that was to be decided. On the merit in light of the evidence
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
