Sections 409, 467 and 477 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 102 Counterfeiting of valuable security by public servants or bankers, merchants or agents. , What, etc., and the definition of account forfeiture evidence, preferential extra-judicial confession of documentary and oral evidence, was the employee of the bank relying on the principle accused and made additional judicial confession related to the crime, the trial court sentenced the accused Sentenced under 409, the accuracy of 467 and 477 APCs, in the presence of documentary evidence, confirms the verification of other documents related to face and word. The terms and provisions contained in Article 102 which documentation was not in the documentary evidence was not evidence. The testimony of the law, 1984, cannot be relied upon. No explanation was provided by any witness as to why the question was being questioned. The entry of documents can be examined and insulted. Additional judicial confessions could not be relied upon as was or could not be made because of the availability of documentary evidence and the availability of documentary evidence that should have been naturally available. Was not presented, oral evidence cannot be relied upon if an employee of the bank approves a document comparing the signature with a signature card or with any negligence or confirms the signature. This may be a misconduct under the organization's rules that could allow the employer to take disciplinary action or impose penalties on account of such misconduct or negligence.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
