Sections 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Tenants Withdrawal of Past and Closed Bargaining. Under the eviction order approved by the court against the tenant by the Current Controller, periodically the lower was restored by a competent person of the lower appellate court who was not the owner. The same is occupied in the premises of the rent and then he has established the title which was against his landlord because of establishing such title he cannot become the owner and that through the fiction of the law such person can be rented. Unless proven otherwise, one of the ways would be to file a lawsuit for specific performance and obtain a decree in this regard and, until then, under the law, they will be bound by the terms of this law. Through which they were ruled. Petitioner failed to give priority to any appeal against the decision passed in the case. The specific performance case filed by the applicant for the specified period was also dismissed for illegal proceedings, which is yet to be restored and the objections raised in their execution petition are clearly lame. Were already examined and rejected by the rent controller and this appeal was dismissed by the lower appellate court. Interruption of orders passed by two courts below the petition dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
