SARIR MUHAMMAD KHAN versus PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION LTD. THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Section 3 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Civil Service Order with no jurisdiction, return benefits, applicants who approve the decision after the Supreme Court But they were restored from office. Officials denied Pillai's benefits to authorities, saying that it was later held by the Supreme Court that the service tribunal did not have jurisdiction over the affairs of corporation employees who were removed from the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000. Action was taken under Therefore, the order of the service tribunal was without jurisdiction and could have no legal consequence on that legal basis, in the other case in view of the subsequent judgment of the Supreme Court, although this order was passed, it was happy and happy. Also, no legal decision could be taken. Authorities accepted and no action was taken to obtain such order on the one hand to the next higher forum; the parties were obliged to the order which was not challenged by them, despite the Supreme Court's order. Despite its contradictory declaration of source law, officials were instructed to allow concessionaire returns in accordance with the orders of the service tribunal petition \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
