SALIM BHALLO versus LEARNED COURT OF DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SOUTH; KARACHI
Against the restrictions on section 3 (2), 13 and 14 National Database and Registration Authority Ordinance (VIII of 2000), Sections 11 and 30 Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Sections 265 K and 561 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application In the Pakistan Trial Court on the violation, the foreigners dismissed the accused's plea for acquittal under Section 6565under, claiming that the CCP accused the National Database and Registration Authority of the cause without issuing a notice to him. The Pakistan Origin Card (POC) has been canceled. The accused further claimed that there was no court. Section 30 of the National Database and Registration Authority Ordinance 2000 Unable to confess any conviction, unless the National Database and Registration Authority has filed a complaint to the Federal Investigation Agency or notified it in the official gazette. I failed to disclose anything to the Investigating Officer by intention to cancel the accused's Pakistan Origin Card (POC) by the Owl Database and Registration Authority, which was neither complainant nor in the witnesses' calendar. The witness was shown, under these circumstances, that the criminal offense under 5 561 A, CRPC, was turned into a different petition and the trial court There was an action against it. Were deleted \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
