Sections 9 (c), 20, 21 and 22 Determination of Drug Recovery Evidence Quantum Minor Conflicts Impact False Impressions A warrant for the arrest of a suspect was found when a small quantity of heroin was recovered on the indictment. ? Retrieved from a co-accused, the trial court sentenced both defendants to seven kilograms of heroin and was sentenced to seven years in prison, according to the indictment, which was raided without obtaining a search warrant. , The evidence of the complainant was corroborated by the evidence of two evidence of validity, which was also supported by the FIR, the arrest of the accused, the recovery of the drug and the report of the chemical analyst, which was positive, Some contradictions and contradictions appeared in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, but did not appear to make the case unsuccessful. Raise doubts about the prosecution or prosecution, because the evidence included by the prosecution was permanent on the matrix and defendant defendant with superficial conviction that he was falsely implicated by the relevant evidence. In the absence of any hostility or controversy, a large amount of heroin could not be imposed on the accused. The nature of the Narcotic Substance Act 1997 was a directorate, so its non-compliance would not be construed to invalidate the trial legally, the evidence that was included during the trial was well established by the trial court. Was appreciated and no interference was guaranteed. Based on the material brought to the trial court record, both defendants rightly so
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
