MINHON KHAN CHANDIO versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU
Article 25 (b) and 33 of the Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application as a bargaining agreement, before the non-receipt of the effect of the court's receipt of the tax, the provision entered into a temporary court and after the payment of the first installment, the remaining two NABs. Payment defaults. A reference was filed against the applicant for the recovery of the default amount and the applicant sought to cancel the said reference on the basis that once the applicant entered into the transaction, the amount was removed under section 33E of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999. Can be obtained under the use of the constitutional jurisdiction as a land tax, the applicant had to approach the court with a clear hand. The High Court could not find any justification as to why the applicant would grant bail. Failure to pay installments, once the applicant has entered into bail Could not, in turn, say that such a sum was to be received from him as the taxation of the land was signed by the provisions of section 33E of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, approved by Chairman NAB after the inquiry. The accountability court never approved the bargaining of the petition, after the approval of the applicant chairman NAB, to seek the provisions of section 33E of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999, in which the case was to be submitted by the accountability court. It was not that the applicant could not have his default premium on the defaulter and that the NAB authorities would have waived the material. The furnace was allowed to file that reflects the NAB chairman. The consent of the accountability court was sought after the application was approved
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
