AVENTIS LTD., KARACHI versus MINISTRY OF LABOUR, MANPOWER AND OVERSEAS PAKISTANIS LABOUR AND MANPOWER DIVISION, GOVERNMENT OF PAK
Offerings, Sections 2 (f), 3, 4 and Schedule CL1, 4 (d) Companies \ Profit (Workers \ Participation) Rules, 1971, Rule 3 and 4A (e) Industrial Relations Act (XC of 2002) I), Sections 2 (xxx) and 20 (13) (d) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petitioner Workers' Prevention of Profit Sharing (WPPF) The Company's responsibility to contribute to WPPF during the year 2004 2004 Denied because the wages of workers increased during this period, there was no worker in the employment of the company as specified in Section 2 (f) of the Companies / Profit (Workers Participation) Act, 1968. The Companies Profit (Workers Participation) Act, 1968, shall apply to companies incorporated in industrial companies. Work to fulfill one of the three (and not harmonious) conditions set forth in CL1 of the Act's Purpose Schedule, as stated in its proposal to provide workers 'participation in companies' profits According to the scheme of the Act, 1968, the work of profit will be given to the employees. The maximum amount fixed by law, and the maximum amount of any employee shall be for the benefit of the workers of a particular company. Rather, it has to be submitted to the WPPF set up for the welfare of the workers in the whole country. The WPPF wording used in total 4 (d) of the Schedule to the Act will not result in the Company having the responsibility to contribute to it, which means that whatever the excess, Must be 0% or 100% and cannot be distributed to workers outside the allotment, must be submitted to the WPPF even if there are no workers in the company. Cannot be interpreted
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
