Find a Lawyer

MRS. ZAHIDA KHAN versus MST. GULNAZ QURESHI

In requesting evacuation of Section 15, the landowner's personal need for housing, U Section A requested that she want to return to Pakistan and occupy her home. And that whenever he came to Pakistan with his family on summer or winter holidays, he was forced to stay at his father's house. The Valdettee tenant had no right to come to Pakistan and live in the destroyed premises. The tenant will have no right to claim that in the first phase the landlord should leave his home in the United States and become a resident of Pakistan here and there and then proceed to sue him if the landlord is permanently settled here. Even if he did not come to Pakistan, he could not lose the use of the premises of his house after visiting the regular Sindh Land Rent Ordinance 1979 or this section was designed specifically for landlords. Was not done - the only permanent resident of Pakistan was the only house with feudal property in Pakistan Accommodation available The absence of tenant proof does not imply that the political situation in the United States for Muslim immigrants was favorable to her, her father's need for personal property. Statement of Authentication Cannot Be Suspected \ r \ nAcceptance Request Accepted \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• ALI ZAHIR JAFARI v. State 2011 YLR 3041
• ROSHNI TELEVISION, Messrs Direct Media Corporation (Private) Ltd. through Chief Executive Officer v. PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY through Chairman 2011 PLD 1
• AVENTIS LTD., KARACHI v. MINISTRY OF LABOUR, MANPOWER AND OVERSEAS PAKISTANIS LABOUR AND MANPOWER DIVISION, GOVERNMENT OF PAK 2011 PLC 1
• PARVEZ ALI v. Mst. ZUBEDA BEGUM 2011 YLR 4
• MEHARBAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 8
• TOOT v. State 2011 YLR 11
• SALLAHUDDIN v. State 2011 MLD 13
• RASHID AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD SHABBIR 2011 PLD 16

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

list of advocates from Diamer lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes