Section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/337 H (2) / 452/34 Qatl e amd, to commit aggravated, negligent AMD, in connection with harassment or domestic negligence. The attempt, which was the grant of the incident, happened at night and such a person was unable to identify the previously known persons, who had committed the crime. The FIR has stated that people gathered in the area at the time of the incident and they Observe the event. If an FIR was lodged immediately after the incident, it is understandable that at this time the complainant had not disclosed who was involved in the FIR of the murder after approximately 18 hours. And the question arises as to why the complainant did not know who the murderers were, when the witnesses there were from the same locality, the accused was accused of being a policeman, the FIR lodger The person did not thank them for not registering. The names of the suspects are not mentioned even after 18 hours of the accused, because those who committed the crime cannot be denied with their background because eyewitnesses later revealed to the complainant that The accused was the person who committed the crime. Such a situation would not mean that the accused were not involved in the crime, but their involvement could be proved only after the testimony of witnesses. After the defendants filed a case for a bail grant, they were granted bail, under conditions
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
