Rule 2302 (b) / QQ Benefit of evidence in the morning The trial court, interested in defining the evidence, sentenced both the accused under section 302 (b), PPC and sentenced them to life imprisonment. And their evidence is subject to exaggerations, contradictions and contradictions, and during the trial no independent witness was presented where the death sentence was to be given, wanting to come to the evidence from unforgivable sources, which in the present case contradicts. And the fact that the police party went to arrest the complaining party at odd hours of the night. According to the FIR, the shootings took place between the complaining party and the police. During the course of the trial, the complainant and their witnesses denied these facts. All such circumstances created a suspicion in the prosecution case. The prosecution had failed to extend the benefit in favor of the accused, beyond any doubt, to prove the guilt of the accused, therefore, the accused deserved the benefit which was extended in their favor and the High Court. The accused were convicted and acquitted on the charge that allowed the appeal. Conditions
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
