Find a Lawyer

FAROOQUE versus STATE

Sections 646464, 392 and murder 34 The benefit of the suspicion of kidnapping or kidnapping for murder and robbery was 15 hours until the alleged kidnapper was released and the FIR was released. No evidence of a delay in filing was brought to the record. The prosecution trial court sentenced the accused and the property trial court failed to take notice of the fact that according to the FIR, the complainant was abducted for three days, but none of the family members complained to the police. The prosecution failed to establish its case without a doubt. The High Court, without a doubt, set aside the punishment and punishment imposed on the accused and increased the benefit of the doubt and acquitted him. circumstances r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• ABDUL REHMAN RANA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION 2011 PLC(CS) 155
• NIAZ ALI v. State 2011 MLD 155
• NELOFAR SAQIB v. SAIBAN BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS 2011 CLC 157
• Syed MUHAMMAD ARSALAN FAIZ v. State 2011 YLR 158
• MATEEN KAMAL v. State 2011 MLD 159
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN v. WALI BHAI INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. 2011 CLD 161
• MUHAMMAD QASIM v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary 2011 CLC 162
• MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA KAMAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division/Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamab 2011 PLC(CS) 162

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

property advocates from Attock lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes