ARDESHIR R. COWASJEE versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI
Sections 39, 42, 54 and 56 (d) of the Sindh Building Control Ordinance (v. 1979), Sections 16, 20 and 20A of the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board Act (I of 1996), Sections 19 and 20 (2) (i) of Civil. Procedure Code (V of 1908), OVII, R11 Defendant of the plaintiff Amenity plot claims that the suit land was classified as a use of facility and was owned by the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board but Plaintiffs attempted to seize the land in an attempt to make money. And that was turned into a commercial building. The High Court rejected it on the ground that it was barred under the law, by section 20 (2) (i) of the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board Act, a separate legal entity was granted to the board. 1996, which states that all movable and immovable properties, including all waterworks and installations administered by the old board, will be present in the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board, no title document is required to prove ownership of this board. Was the operation under the law. The whole becomes the owner of the plot, including all its waterworks and installations, which were kept by an ejector for a long time with the defendant claiming his title and title in the dispute to the defendant. Subsequent transfer / mutation had to be justified in favor of. Depending on the determination of title to the building being constructed in the underground plot, it still needs to be established whether the plot was a convenience project and could not be changed for residential or commercial use. The plot was illegally divided into three parts. Building project work
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
