Rejecting the applicants' application, rejecting the plea of Section 12 (2) and AXXIII, R 3, it is stated that the plaintiff has obtained the signature of the compromise request by fraud and risk his life. The settlement application was accepted in the presence of the applicant, who, after approving the consent decree, did not object to its approval, the applicant had, in a statement, approached him for execution, In which case he did not raise such an application, the applicant filed an application under section 12 (2). ), CPC, Two years after filing a contempt of court petition against the plaintiff for disobeying the consent decree, the applicant had accepted the consent decree and Nazir had nothing to do with the record. Was not raised to show that a fraud was carried out in court or obtained from a false statement of facts by consent decree, in the circumstances under section 12 (2) of the CPC Dismissed \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
