KHURSHID ALAM versus SECRETARY DEFENCE, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI
Section 4 Civil Aviation Authority Rules, RR 3 & 28 & 3 30 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 63 and 199 Constitutional Application to Respondent Employee of Parks and Horticulture Authority, Over Grade on Deputation in Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) To grade. He was employed in the PHA, and then in CAA, such sentiments on a regular basis would not be public servants and civil servants in the company formed by such a high organization as the Provincial Assembly. A separate corporate entity was created by an Act of, therefore, its employees were not employees of the provincial government. But no other civil aviation authority has ever applied. It was taken under the Civil Aviation Authority rules. The Civil Aviation Authority absorbed the respondents in high grades without any PR for defining any qualifications where a post was present, there was a determination of how to add the qualification and method, a person through CAA The question of absentee policy of the payee) could not be considered. The decision of the Federal Government to create a high office and absorb its respondents was not taken by the Board of CAA, but rather by the appointment of Chairman CAA and Director General of the Federal Government, CAA. The defendant was taken from the PAA on deputation. And as a result absorb it at a higher level
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
