Find a Lawyer

SONERI BANK LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEYS versus ELITE PUBLISHERS LIMITED

Suits for Debt Receipt for the Defense of Sections 9 and 10 Suits, not showing the amount of money received by the respondent for such application and payment to the bank with the payment dates, the defendant's The facts payable and supporting facts are not disputed by the defendant in a document attached to a petition complying with the provisions of section 14 (4) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 1984. Was it that the defendant did not pay the financing within the stipulated period to get the financing to run? The question had failed to take. Law or facts High Court rejects leave request and dismisses case as per prayer

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• ARDESHIR R. COWASJEE v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI 2011 MLD 745
• MINHON KHAN CHANDIO v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU through Director General, Regional National Accountability Bureau 2011 YLR 746
• ABDUL ZAHOOR KHAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 747
• JALAL AKBAR v. State 2011 PCrLJ 754
• U.I.G. (PVT.) LIMITED through Director v. MUHAMMAD IMRAN QURESHI 2011 CLC 758
• SAFDAR ALI v. State 2011 PCrLJ 765
• FIDA HUSSAIN v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Home Secretary 2011 MLD 766
• AMANULLAH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary to Government of Sindh 2011 CLC 772

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

pakistani advocates Phagwar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes