Section 8 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), sections 115 and O VII, R 11 suit have already been filed under the rental lawsuit against the plaintiff in his written statement alleging the dismissal of the suit. Landlord and tenant relationships between the claimant parties are denied. The property under consideration was sold in 1960 against fair consideration which was to be paid in installments and in the 1980 plaintiff he paid the installments, in which case it was also claimed that under the rent law. The trial was eventually dismissed for illegal proceedings, and the plaintiff has neither restored the case nor filed a lawsuit for the declaration that the defendant does not own the property, almost from the date of dismissal of the case. After sixteen years, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit for ownership and recovery of the money for consideration for use and possession. The property in question says that most of the 17 plaintiffs had filed a lawsuit, and those five included the person who had previously filed a lawsuit against the defendant in 1985 under rental rules, While either of them were sons, daughters, grandchildren and other grandchildren who were parties to the case, the defendant was shown his maid who was in possession of the property. , It was contrary to the view that the petition was filed under O. VII, R 11, CPC, in order to file a case against the position taken under the Rant Laws which did not result in a proper trial. Was. The plaintiff had no reason to file a lawsuit. Prior to the case under the rent law
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
