Section 114, AXLVII, R1 and Section 12 (2) of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 (1) of the High Court's appeal against the order passed by a single bench of the High Court, of the trial court division bench Filed against order The court set aside such an order and remanded the single bench to pass the latest order. The High Court's divisional division bench's review petition for withdrawal of such order was not appealable because its challenge was not approved by a single bench in its original civil jurisdiction division. The Bench approved the unconstitutional order, stating that it was not jurisdiction under any provision of the law. The impugned order is a banal order and due to the absence of an irregular law in the law. There will be no restriction against any formal order. The revision request was not time bound. Only proceedings that were not ultimately resolved in accordance with the law cannot be reopened. An impeded order was passed in violation of Section 3 (1) of the Law Reform Ordinance. Ennis, 1972, thus, it was not finalized and it was not a past and closed matter, a revision request could be retained as part of the CPC provisions, in the absence of a specific emission law. Appeals filed under the Reform Ordinance 1972 will take effect. In its inherent jurisdiction, the revision request may be turned into an application under section 12 (2), the CPC High Court accepted the revision request and the impugned order was withdrawn and all the grounds made thereunder Cancel actions
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
