SYED MUREED HUSSAIN SHAH versus SYED ZAMEER HUSSAIN SHAH
Article 12 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 52, A XXI, R 34 and O XXII, R 12 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Order for the execution of creditors of the judiciary, Act of Court for the specific performance of the sale agreement The death of the decree was passed in favor of the respondents in the interest of the respondents and the execution of the decree was granted by the ruling court in the order dated 129 1985, in which the sale proceeded in its favor. For, the balance cell device was to be deposited. It submitted the cell deed on 20 5 1986, executed on 10 December 2007, was executed by a court official in favor of the defendant, who was the legal heir of the perpetrators of the death sentence. Balance Sale Consideration After Decree Implementation Prohibition Was Forbidden On 20 5 6 1986 The decree holder, the decree holder, had nothing to do on the sale deed in favor of the Official Court of Delegate Holder. Was to be executed and the delay of execution could only be attributed to the offenders of the judgment and their legal heirs after their death. After considering the sale of the balance cell to the CO or the trial court official, the plaintiffs were not required to move a separate application to obtain the registration of the Sale Dead Act of Court. No one should be prejudiced and the refusal of the fruits of the decree to the holders or their legal representatives under the order or the reasons for the decision of the trial court official to determine their duty. It may not be necessary that after the execution of the verdict on the death of the verdict, the legal
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
