HASHOO (PVT.) LTD. versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
Arts 24 and 199 Constitutional Appeal Property The right to hold the Audi Ultram Permit, the applicant's principle regretted the cancellation of the allotment in his favor, the authorization letter issued did not state the reason for the cancellation of the allotment / lease. The act of law was not to deprive any person of his property without the practice of law without giving the respondents the opportunity to be heard by giving a show cause notice to the person who passed due to this order. Article 24 guarantees that the fundamental right to bail will cancel the order allotment of land, even on its face. Ni, crooked, and had no reason and was also contrary to the principle of Audi altyrm partym should not hear anyone, which was read in the Constitution and can not be sustained in order for such legislation. The Land Acquisitions Collector is entitled to the award of 1979, which is enforced according to the law, but the order of cancellation of the lot was left aside for the respondents and thus the allotment was restored to the respondent. It was allowed accordingly
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
