Find a Lawyer

BASHARAT ALI versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), theft of section 380 in residential home bail, the delay in further investigations in the filing of the FIR was without any plausible explanation and no independent witnesses were referenced in the FIR Was given against which no recovery was performed. Although both the complainant and the accused were based in the same local complainant and the accused were angry with each other on some matters. It seems that the case of the accused is a further investigation, the accused has been granted bail, in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• WASIF ELLAHI v. State 2011 YLR 1708
• SAJJAD GONDAL v. ORIX LEASING PAKISTAN LIMITED 2011 CLD 1711
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL alias CAPTAIN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1714
• MY BANK LIMITED v. MUSLIM COTTON MILLS (PVT.) LTD. 2011 CLD 1721
• GHULAM ABBAS v. State 2011 YLR 1723
• ASMAT RASOOL QADRI v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1726
• ABID IQBAL v. EXPORT PROCESSING ZONE AUTHORITY 2011 CLC 1726
• HASHOO (PVT.) LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2011 MLD 1729

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

advocate for immigration from Narowal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes