Section 497 (2) Control of Narcotic Substance (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (b) (c) possession of drug paraphernalia, approval of further investigating party despite confirmation of espionage report, to confirm Also failed to share the private witness. The alleged recovery of marijuana; and none of the marijuana buyers was cited in the FIR, although the accused was allegedly selling the alleged marijuana, however, no further investigation was required on how many pieces of the recovered marijuana. Were taken. The chemical examination exceeded the total quantity of 1100 grams of alleged burglaries, which proved to be a crime under Sections 9 (b) and 9 (c) of the Narcotic Drugs Act 1997, which has since been imprisoned since 1911 2009. I was. The arrest was granted, under conditions
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
