INSPECTOR ABDULLAH versus CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, BADIN
Article 187 Police Order (22 of 2002), Article 155 (c) (D) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 249 Permission to assist a civil servant when bans are prohibited; The petition for the accused under section 249A, the CCPC court, passed a non-controversial order stating that the application was dismissed on the ground that no witnesses were examined in the case. Was gone The court also found that in the absence of evidence of the prosecution's testimony, this decision cannot be made. The charge against the accused was unfounded. An application taken by the accused in the petition filed by him was very important and necessary for the proper decision of the petition, hearing the DPO rejecting the certificate issued by the trial. The court also ignored this important aspect. The first person shows that the applicant has been posted at the police station, which is because he has been posted to the police station after the incident which is mentioned in the showcase notice against whom. The proceedings against were initiated because the trial court failed to publicize on this important aspect of the case, so it would be in the interest of justice to set aside the unknown order and decide the case under section 249A. Get remanded to. The Assistant Prosecutor General had no objection to the fact that the impound order was set aside after the CRPC considered the ground in the application and the matter was disposed of within a month under Section 249A, C.R. Rim down to the court to decide the application under the PC
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
