Sections 6 and 7 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Articles 302, 147, 148 and 149 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), section 561 A Qtl e amd, An order for possession of illegal weapons, a request for the police, an inquiry was submitted to the Anti-Terrorism Court for a challan case, but the judge ordered the police papers to be investigated by the court under the controversial order. Returning to submit the invoice for, the judge's opinion that sections 6 and 7 of the Anti Terrorism Act 1997 were not attracted to the matter. During the verdict, whether the invoice was entertained or not, the trial court failed to consider the original context of section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, and the challan was reversed, without giving the impression that it was a previous one. There was a case of enmity, which was not the only standard to be decided. When the court considered gravity and sarri when passing an unlawful order, after violent action and the ouster of the oppressor, he expressed different views. In order to know the severity of the allegations, whether or not Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 is applicable, the FIR It is better to consider the deposit. The complainant photographed the incident and estimated that three people were brutally killed in daylight at a shop in the bazaar, at which time the accused climbed to the roof of the shop. ? All the accused, who were killed on the roof and three men in the crowd, were accused of firing heavy air into harassment and terrorism. Daylight in a shop located in the market
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
