Find a Lawyer

MIR KHAN versus ALLAH WADHAYO PITAFI/SIP/SHO POLICE STATION PIR JO GOTH

The statement eliminating Section 200 and 439 complaints was recorded under Section 200, CR PC, as well as the statements of the three witnesses, which were filed in the complaint. Illegal imprisonment; robbery; taking articles; bribery and harassment; the interests of justice will be fulfilled if an unknown order is set aside and the matter is forwarded to the trial court so that All previously existing material may be considered. If it is deemed necessary to summon other witnesses. Record your statements before the final decision, and then pass a reasonable and careful order to the direct complaint.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• GHULAM ABBAS v. State 2011 YLR 1348
• SALEEM IQBAL QURESHI v. A.I. BROTHERS (PVT.) LTD. 2011 YLR 1351
• BAKHTIAR AHMED v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Education and Literacy Department 2011 PLC(CS) 1353
• Miss JAVARIA v. MEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, JAMSHORO 2011 CLC 1356
• DEWAN DEVELOPMENT (PVT.) LTD. v. MYBANK LTD. 2011 MLD 1368
• SULTAN v. State 2011 YLR 1369
• NOORUDDIN v. NAZEER AHMED 2011 PCrLJ 1370
• Mrs. FARZANA v. MUHAMMAD MATEEN KHAN 2011 CLC 1371

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

divorce advocates from Panjan Kisan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes