Specific performance of the property transfer memorandum by the claimant in compliance with Articles 42, 12 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A. XXXXX, RR1 and 2 of the Declaration, Permanent Order and Memorandum of Understanding The declaration, with the bank's condition that the bank would constitute and restructure the plaintiff's liability, which the bank temporarily failed to apply for the injunction, so that the bank would have a third party interest in such property. To prevent this from happening, there may be certain affiliations and / or suicide attacks in memory of this understanding. The unconditional transfer of property by the plaintiff in favor of the bank was an action undertaken by the bank to restructure the plaintiff's liabilities so that he could make a profit and repurchase such property. The bank was unable to perform its part of the agreement as agreed under the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding of such memo before there were still rejected and authenticated documents through contract and sale deeds. He was not, therefore, eligible for specific performance; no business entity (in the current case, the Menlo of Reconciliation) would enter into the contract without any consideration. The claimant's interest in such property with the conditional sale was to be protected until the bank had complied with the terms of the memorandum of understanding on the decision of the matter; the High Court raised the interest of the third party until the bank's final decision on the suit. Was prevented from r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
