Find a Lawyer

MEEZAN BANK LIMITED versus DEWAN SALMAN FIBRES LIMITED

Defendant has accepted an amount of Rs. 165,257,526 in defense application for leave application on the request for recovery of provisions 9 and 10 suit loan. That he would be satisfied if it was an interim order. The defendant's liability counsel for the defendant had no objection to the interim decree for the sanctioned amount, and he further prayed that permission be granted for the defense of his leave. Granted, with the consent of the lawyer, a leave application for defense was granted and the same was changed in a written statement; at the request of both advisers on the parties, the court appointed a chartered accountant to resolve the dispute. Appointed Commissioner.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• HABIB BANK LIMITED v. BAHJANI SCRAP TRADING COMPANY LLC 2011 PLD 257
• MEHMOOD-UL-HASSAN v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2011 PLC 258
• MUNIER AHMED v. TAHIRA KHANUM 2011 MLD 261
• MUZAFFAR H. SUFI v. FIRST WOMEN BANK LIMITED 2011 CLD 262
• PAK GREASE MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLC 265
• Al-WAQAR CORPORATION v. RICE EXPORT CORPORATION 2011 MLD 266
• KASB BANK LIMITED v. DEWAN SALMAN FIBRE LIMITED 2011 CLD 267
• MUMTAZ ALI v. S.H.O. NAUSHAHRO FEROZ 2011 PCrLJ 268

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

law firms from Lala rukh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes