Deletion of hearing remarks under Section 561A of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/448/447/148/149 and 182 Crimes Against Property (Ordinance Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (3). In the judgment, the trial court acquitted the accused and ordered them to initiate proceedings against the complainant of the case under Section 182, CCPC, and another said that through the present petition, the accused has been honored. The evil was not done, but they were overcome by the benefit of the doubt. The person was not issued a show cause notice which was not a party to the proceedings in section 182, used for CRPC section 182, presiding officer of the PPC, being the Presiding Officer Additional Sessions Judge of the court. Was unaware of this law. It appears that Pakistan knew nothing of the proper use of the provisions of the Penal Code, and that the presiding officer of the Criminal Code of the trial court was exposed to some sort of unnecessary deliberation. The accused was affected, which resulted in such remarks against the complainant and an anonymous person, who had no nexus at any stage of the trial and was not a party to the proceedings and thus The remarks were passed against him after the break. On the benefit of the doubt, the accused not only misused the provisions of section 182, CCPC, but even went beyond the scope of section 182, by the presiding officer of the PPC trial court. Improper endorsements were removed as a result, accordingly
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
