Find a Lawyer

SHAH MUHAMMAD versus EXPORT PROCESSING ZONES AUTHORITY

By respondent to Section 24 Arbitration Act (X40 of 1940), Section 34 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 and 54 suit declarations, allotment of plot in the Suite Export Processing Zone for injunction and damage Issuance of cancellation notice for failure of key allotment. Any other document between the parties to a valid agreement or the parties to establish the application for processing of the plaintiff's export goals and to refer the dispute to arbitration does not conflict with the plaintiff's term. It was Such a contract was rejected in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• GIIULAM QADIR v. State 2011 YLR 2361
• KHURSHEED AHMED JUNEJO v. State 2011 YLR 2368
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2011 YLR 2379
• JALAL DIN v. State 2011 YLR 2393
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. Mst. NAHEED 2011 YLR 2420
• HAKIM ALI v. State 2011 YLR 2426
• GHULAM HYDER v. State 2011 YLR 2446
• UMESH KUMAR alias MAHESH KUMAR v. NANIK RAM 2011 YLR 2456

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Kundina lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes