Section 5 365A Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (e) Abduction Suspicion Benefits Prosecution was located in a densely populated area where there was a public call office as well as a grocery store. The party did. Do not pay ransom directly to the accused, not even mentioning who received the ransom through the prosecution's witness, who was not examined during the trial, to identify the defendants. Illegal work was done during the test and none of the articles were saved or recovered. The trial court sentenced the convicted and the accused to life imprisonment to prove the ownership of the accused, no documents of the possession of the accused were recovered during the inquiry. The prosecution fails to prove the accused against a shadow beyond reasonable doubt Many doubts are being raised in only one case A careful mind, its benefit to be extended to the accused But not as a favor but the trial court convicted by the trial court was set aside and they were acquitted of the charge, in which case the appeal was allowed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
