Find a Lawyer

GIIULAM QADIR versus STATE

Definition of Section 2 (b (b) evidence) Prosecution's evidence was not subject to any material contradiction or contradiction It was not sufficient to exclude the witnesses' testimony with the deceased only if similarly affected medical evidence provided ocular evidence. The prosecution's witnesses had set fire to the suspects in their evidence, the prosecution's witnesses had said, matching the number of casualties received at the time of the crime scene recovered. The pistol had been recovered. The prosecution's evidence was natural and credible, the trial court had already taken a gentle approach and the accused was sentenced to less than a sentence, and the conviction of the accused in the circumstances was retained.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• QAMAR HUSSAIN v. State 2011 YLR 2327
• MAQSOOD ZAMAN v. State 2011 YLR 2335
• IRFAN ALI v. State 2011 YLR 2349
• NISAR AHMED v. State 2011 YLR 2356
• KHURSHEED AHMED JUNEJO v. State 2011 YLR 2368
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2011 YLR 2379
• JALAL DIN v. State 2011 YLR 2393
• SHAH MUHAMMAD v. EXPORT PROCESSING ZONES AUTHORITY 2011 YLR 2413

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocates from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes