PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED versus MASKATIYA INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED
Sections 42, 54 and 55 of the Civil Defense Act (XXXI of 1952), Section 2 of the Civil Defense (Special Powers) Rules, 1951, R10 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXX, Rule 1 and 2 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 23 Suits Release, Permanent and Compulsory Order and Damages Pakistan Refinery Limited (PRL) has been built as an installation at Kent Point Installation 1A Kent Point Installation 1A 200 yards adjacent to Key Point Intelligence Division No structure can be picked up without prior permission. Inter-Services Intelligence) The temporary injunction to prevent such construction without the PPID's permission to build a private factory in close proximity to the PRL was not requested in the trial for a suitable plaintiff. In the event that the plaintiff refuses to grant permission, what will happen to him? The effect, whether the plaintiff will compensate the defendant or obtain the defendant's property at market value with or without compensation, is the question whether the plaintiff was factory W, 200 yards away from PRL, only deciding. Or issues can be decided only after further question whether the entire installation of the PRL will be considered as key point installation A 1 or only its terminals HC instructs its Nazir to measure the actual distance. What? The PRL and the Plaintiff Factory High Court allowed the defendant to erect a boundary wall on the suit plot at his own risk so that he could avoid the encroachment, but prevented from building the factory on it. The High Court settled the matter and instructed the parties. That he should resolve the arguments to include legal points.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
