Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD QASIM versus STATE

Section 7 (e) Conduct of Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 365 A / 34 Abduction for ransom, kidnapping or kidnapping for possession, valuable security, acts of joint intent by several persons in full confidence. The accused was fully involved in the escalation. The record revealed that the mobile phone recovered from the accused was used to call the complainant. The accused did not voluntarily revoke the judicial confession before the accused recorded his confessional statement. ? Independent evidence presented by the complainant, the kidnapper and the police was not accused of false accusations No tampering was made in the journal entry because the kidnapper was kept by the accused's house. Because the tenant prosecution has proved that the eal was not dismissed in the case beyond doubt, the decision not to imply any impairment in the case was rejected.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• ASIF S. SAJAN v. REHAN ASSOCIATES 2011 PLD 542
• MUHAMMAD KHYZER YOUSUF DADA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Interior 2011 PLD 546
• PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED v. MASKATIYA INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED 2011 CLD 550
• ANJUMAN MASJID NEW TOWN v. MUHAMMAD SHAHID ZAKI 2011 PLD 550
• MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. BRITISH HIGH COMMISSIONER 2011 PLD 553
• HYDER BAKHSH v. State 2011 MLD 555
• HABIBULLAH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Revenue 2011 PLD 559
• RIFFAT HASSAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue/Secretary, Revenue Division 2011 PLC(CS) 562

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

criminal advocate from Kazi Ahmed lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes