Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus BRITISH HIGH COMMISSIONER

Section 23 (2), 28A & 34 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 151 Land Acquisition Claims and Land Acquisition Interest Powers award During the execution of the Award Officer, the obligations of the judgment were kept Withholding money The decision lenders had 15% urgency charges and 6% interest offers that such charges could not be levied by the Land Acquisition Officer, but the court had taken the same legal position and had acquired the land. Jurisdiction was granted under Sections 28A and 34 of the Act. , In 1894, to obtain the option of awarding the award of 15 and also to pay 6% interest to the person upon whom the Land High Court rejected the objection raised by the decision lenders.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• MUHAMMAD KHYZER YOUSUF DADA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Interior 2011 PLD 546
• PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED v. MASKATIYA INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED 2011 CLD 550
• ANJUMAN MASJID NEW TOWN v. MUHAMMAD SHAHID ZAKI 2011 PLD 550
• MUHAMMAD QASIM v. State 2011 YLR 551
• HYDER BAKHSH v. State 2011 MLD 555
• HABIBULLAH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Revenue 2011 PLD 559
• RIFFAT HASSAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue/Secretary, Revenue Division 2011 PLC(CS) 562
• RAJIB ALI v. State 2011 YLR 563

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

top advocates from Pasni lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes