Section 151 and A XXXVIII, R 5 suit for recovery of money The plaintiff was arrested before the defendant's decision to attach immovable property to the defendant's decision to issue a surety equal to the amount of the defendant. Removing luggage in your premises. And was secretly negotiating to dispose of his immovable property and create a third-party interest to defeat the approved decree to justify the request. On several occasions, the defendant denied any ownership of the property mentioned in the petition or any hassle, five years had passed since the date of filing the case and filing such application, But the defendant was still doing his business, while his conviction or closure was not charged by the plaintiff The plaintiff was pursuing a dismissal case against the plaintiff if the FF was merely an arrest and He accused Ganji that the defendants were trying to hide and sell the property, which the defendant had with the country. Services were denied Such r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
