MST. SURRIYA REHMAN versus SIEMENS PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD.
Section 2 (a) and job 34 Suit for recovering damages due to unlawful termination of employment contract, application for such contract arbitration clause, in any case the term of the contract of employment. Is born after words. The terms and conditions of this employment agreement require the plaintiff to disclose the dispute not within the scope of such arbitration clause. Such words were somewhat different from those commonly used in the arbitration clause. Such a clause was limited to the manner in which the dispute arose. Claims relating to the termination of the contract of employment and otherwise, the employment dispute is disputed and the defendant allegedly received damages for the maintenance of the contract of employment due to injury and injury. Such a dismissal would result in the plaintiff's claim being disclosed, as will the plaintiff's disclosure, plus a small portion of it. Such an arbitration clause should not be barred in connection with the aggregate claim, and in connection with the claim of the principal arbitrator regarding the dispute, then the case should not be barred, But not exhaustively, as revealed in the claimant's scope of arbitration clause. Such a request was dismissed and the defendant was instructed to file a written statement within the stipulated period.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
