Find a Lawyer

RAJIB ALI versus STATE

Section 9 (c) drug possession evidence Definition Investigation Officer can neither explain the standard / formula imposed by it nor can it separately sample the bars recovered from the accused. He may disclose the amount of marijuana each time a chemical inspector reports. Regarding the statement of the analyst officer who never presented the marijuana in court to the Laboratory Investigation Officer about the amount of marijuana that was not used in the analysis and was used by the Chemical Examiner Investigation The support was made out of dishonesty. Failure to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt that the police official was a prosecution App r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. BRITISH HIGH COMMISSIONER 2011 PLD 553
• HYDER BAKHSH v. State 2011 MLD 555
• HABIBULLAH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Revenue 2011 PLD 559
• RIFFAT HASSAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue/Secretary, Revenue Division 2011 PLC(CS) 562
• AISHA STEEL MILLS LTD. Through Director, Karachi v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division/Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islama 2011 PTD 569
• THE STATE through Additional Advocate-General, Sindh v. MUHAMMAD NAZIR 2011 YLR 570
• KASHIF AKRAM v. Mst. NAILA 2011 MLD 571
• Mst. SURRIYA REHMAN v. SIEMENS PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD. 2011 PLD 571

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

law firms from Khanpur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes