KAUKAB IQBAL versus P.T.C.L. THROUGH PRESIDENT/C.E.O.
Article 199 Constitution Maintenance Pro Bono Public Petition The Controversial Question Alternative to the Reality The applicant was the chairman of a registered society, which received Pakistan Telecommunications Corporation Limited (PTCL) on receiving an additional 199 rupees per month from each user for special telephone. ) Had filed a public petition. The package is called the Pakistan Package, and the response to the increase in local call charges was that the applicant was not viable and contained a controversial question as to whether to take advantage of this and to protect the interests of millions of consumers. The applicant had filed a Binu Public Petition. The Pakistan package has affected millions of users and some users may have been unaware of the imposition of the PTCLD package, which was not an easy and straightforward process and the Pakistan package on millions of users. Implementation of the bill will result in increased bills. In the past, some consumers increased local call charges after eight years for various reasons, including inflation and keeping prices around the world, via PTCL's Right of PTCL, others' pen, if any privileges. Or relinquish any rights but is harmful to most consumers. The increase in local call charges was a mixed question of fact and law, which would require the recording of evidence to the decision, therefore, it could not be resolved even within the jurisdiction of the Constitution, despite the aggravation of the issue. Despite the presence of alternative methods, the High Court refused to issue any case. The direction of the respondents was dealt with accordingly
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
