BILAL AHMED BHUTTO versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY WORKS AND SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Article 199 The Constitutional Applicant for Applicants had begun to level and park the public park, but they believed that the bill pit was not available less than 7 miles away, as it was prepared and approved by the Authority. Applicant for raising the rates for the work was given, said that the pit will be excavated from a pit lying 7 miles from the park location but funds were not released by the authorities of the Judicial Petitioner Tender. Was fully aware of the details at the time of accepting the tender. It moved a desperate request for an increase in land prices; in collaboration with the department officials, the petitioner completed the construction work after accepting tender notices which clearly mentioned the distance to the pit. That extra rates were demanded on a bead basis to cause losses. Public treasury petitions, due to misunderstanding, will be dropped. r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
