Sections 3, 5, 6 and 10 against the Department of the Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974), Section 4 Service Appellant (Police Force Youths) for misconduct of a laborer's wife under mandatory retirement. Action was taken and he was dismissed. After ordering the charge sheet and the inquiry by the district police officer against them, the order of dismissal from the service was subsequently changed to mandatory retirement and the appellants filed an appeal against them, The inquiry committee's findings show that it was on that basis. The disc did not contain statements from "cautious" detainees who could not legally base disciplinary proceedings against a civil servant in the inquiry proceedings, who reported sexual harassment and rape. About and compromised between them. After the incident, both parties and the appellate authority were subjected to misunderstandings, depending on the findings of the inquiry committee, which was not based on any evidence which led both the woman and her husband to support the overall complaint first. Did not require departmental action to fulfill the end of justice. The case of general misconduct may have been different, but in view of the serious allegations against the personnel present in uniform, and the fact that the appellate authority had taken a softer approach, modifying the dismissal penalty. In compulsory retirement service, more relaxation appeals were partially accepted and
