CONSTABLE AMIR SHAKOOR versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE HAZARA RANGE, ABBOTTABAD
Sections 3, 5 and 10 of the Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974), Section 4 Service Appellant / Police Constable, he was dismissed after he was charged and investigated. Was accused of forcibly seizing money with him. The complainant and his accomplice, while in plain clothes and questioning themselves as a CIA staff member, were prosecuted according to the law / rules against the appellant. They were given the opportunity to examine the witnesses, including the complainant, but could not take advantage of the opportunity. And in front of the inquiry officer, he did not want to examine witnesses, the appellant could not give any evidence of misconduct and ill-will against the complainant, all the necessary requirements were met under the law / rules in the appellant's case. Well, both were properly charged. And on the basis of the complaint against them, they were presented with allegations, serious charges of harassing civilians and forcibly stripping them of money by uniformed personnel, which was meant to protect the honor and dignity of the citizens. Were responsible for, could not. Keep an eye on any appeals that have been dismissed on any basis. \ r \ n \ r \ n