HABIB SAID versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, (FATA), PESHAWAR
Prior to the Section 10 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunals Act (Constitution of 1974), the Section 4 transfer was transferred to the employee earlier and he worked for about five months at the place where he was transferred, but when he Before he was transferred, he filed the Department of Appeal whose appeal was accepted and said that the transfer order was canceled. The employee was reshuffled only after seven months. Said that the transfer was rejected without cause, before the appellate tribunal employee was repeatedly transferred from one office to another. Yep. Within a short period of seven months while another employee was posted against the employee's position, the employee did not meet his usual term which was against the government transfer policy. Was against , In which the agency officer was assigned eligibility for BPS 1 to 10 employees, the political agent for NDBPS 11 to 15 employees was placed on an impeded order without legal authority and The employee shall continue against this position in accordance with the policy of the Government till the completion of his usual term.
