AZIZ-UR-RAHMAN versus PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER (I.G.P.), PESHAWAR
Section 7 Northwestern Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974), Section 4 Police Rules, 1934, Rr 19 26 and 19 26 (4) Certification of service appellant who received necessary training after joining the police department. Sub-Inspector was prosecuting. The Promotion List \ F and Development Prosecutors were promoted as inspectors appellant, who claimed that the rules should be verified as a sub-inspector from the date of their appointment, but they were confirmed. It was claimed that it was only about six to six years after his appointment. Appeals were contested by the department on the basis that the appellants were appointed against temporary positions and they were confirmed on the basis of permanent positions. That the Prosecuting Sub Inspectors were subject to the examination they received with promotional credit. Appellants against permanent vacancies were to be appointed by the Public Service Commission, while they were appointed by the DIG on a temporary basis. Jobs were eligible for job certification because from the date of their appointment, all inspectors were not relevant to the seniority determination to pass the test with prosecutorial credit, making appointment to the Public Service Commission under R 19 28 (4) of the Police Rules, 1934. There was no authority, but the status of a recommendation body was not important in this case because once it was discovered that the appellant's case was merit and he was able to take some of the relevant laws / rules. Were right. And denying the benefit would be the same as discriminating against other employees for the same benefit, based on the limitations.
