MALIK WAQAS AHMED versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY OF MINISTRY FOR WATER AND POWER
Sections 3, 5, 6 and 8 (2) (ii), (5) (a) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Petition Against Advertising Positions Despite High Levels in Gujranwala Electric Power Company Limited (GEPCO) Denial of appointment of veterans. Required educational qualification, but the candidates recommended by the Federal Minister for WAPADA were completely disregarded by the merit policy. Property Advertising from Districts Under GEPCO's Work Area Contains a limited number of posts from the candidates and did not extend the entire record of Punjab province. In the appointments, 242 belongs to the district Rawalpindi, which does not fall within the area of work of the GEPCO Corrigendum which was issued by the competent authority, not to mention extending the invitation for applications throughout Punjab. But requested that the other terms and conditions remain the same. The Authority did not take the written test, but made the appointment based on the recommendations of the Minister's record prepared by the Authority, with great difficulty and hesitation, showed that most of the applications of the appointed candidates were incomplete and the GEP available on record. The tampering with the CEO's Letter of Chief Executive indicates that some political forces have exceeded their powers, and they have done what they were not supposed to do to any authority and the conditions laid down in the recruitment policy. Had no moral and legal jurisdiction to deviate from, because of the process of law, This was not applied in anonymous appointments because no rights were created in it. Advertising intense
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
